| |
The loneliness of the double agent
The Times, September 23rd 1997
Ever since Alan Maclean was recalled as a young man from his diplomatic
post in New York, walking, as he puts it, into a "world-class scandal",
he has lived under the shadow of treachery. Arriving at London Airport
on a cold morning in 1951, he was hurried into a Daimler by anonymous
bureaucrats and told that his brother, Donald Maclean, was suspected of
being a Soviet spy and had disappeared with Guy Burgess. The pair later
reappeared in Moscow, having escaped on a cross-Channel steamer from
Southampton to St Malo, the beginning of their long journey into
ignominy.
The event was the defining moment of Alan Maclean's life. "I knew as
soon as I was called home," he says, "that any hope I had of a
diplomatic career was over and that I would have to look for something
else to do."
Being bright and well-connected, he quickly found work in publishing,
surprisingly un concerned at being deprived of his career of choice by a
brother whose deceit and duplicity he refuses to condemn. "Why should I
condemn him?" he asks, peaceably enough. "I'm not a political person,
and if you love somebody it doesn't matter what they do." He pauses,
sips iced water. "No, of course, it matters. What I meant is that you
can't stop loving someone just because they have done something
absolutely frightful."
Reclining in his chair, elegantly smoking a long, thin menthol
cigarette, Maclean is the model of a certain type of a Englishman slowly
disappearing from public life: the urbane amateur. The self-consciously
preposterous title of his memoirs offers a flavour of the man. "Once," he says, explaining the background, "when I was working at Macmillan
publishers, we jokingly tried to think of the most boring title for an
autobiography. I came up with No, I Tell a Lie, It Was the Tuesday , and
made a private note to use it if I ever wrote my autobiography."
His father, Sir Donald, was a distinguished solicitor and former Liberal
Cabinet minister, and Alan's early years were spent in affluent
seclusion in north Cornwall. Donald, whom he adored, was 12 years his
senior.
In his jaunty memoir, Maclean writes of Donald with wary tenderness,
describing his brother as "glamorously distant", a tall, athletic,
non-conformist.
Donald's political radicalism was apparent even during his time at
Gresham's School in Norfolk, where he read Marx and Hegel. "I think his
headmaster, though pleased that Donald was bright and responsible enough
to take his own political line, thought he would grow out of it."
He never did, of course. At Cambridge, where he gained a starred first,
and all through his years at the Foreign Office and at the British
Embassy in Washington, Donald spun a web of elaborate deceit. As a
diplomat, he was meticulous and conscientious, a rigid stickler for the
Official Secrets Act. But he was also part of an intricate spy network,
with branches in the United States, Canada and Britain, as well as being
prone to night rages and drunkenness.
Reflecting on his brother's betrayal, Maclean says: "I can't help but
look back at what he did with anything but detachment. I was absolutely
devoted to him. He was terribly good to me when I was a child,
especially when I was so miserable as a schoolboy at Stowe. I remember,
in particular, Donald saying to me that if things ever got too bad at
school, I should let him know and he would come and get me out."
That expression of reassurance, he says, offered an "escape route" from
a school, the dormitories of which were patrolled by a "bullying,
alcoholic" housemaster.
Maclean's childhood, blighted by the death of his father when he was
seven, divides into the "happy years" of his Cornish idyll, and those
spent in Kensington, where his mother opened a knitwear shop, and at
Stowe. His London years were set against the political turmoil of the
Civil War in Spain and the gathering clouds of another war - the years
when many young Oxbridge intellectuals were drawn to the messianic
socialism of Marx and Lenin. Maclean says: "In this respect, Donald was
shaped by the attitudes and events of his time. He became more committed
after Spain."
Of the Cambridge spies, Maclean agrees that Kim Philby and the debauched
Guy Burgess, driven by a reckless fear of boredom, derived pleasure from
a life of treachery. He is less sure, however, about his brother. "Being
a spy isn't something my brother would have entered into lightly. It is
a terrible way to live, just awful." Maclean clearly understands that
there is no one lonelier than the double agent. Addicted to secrecy and
loyal only to himself, he lives in a condition of perpetual
watchfulness.
After Donald defected to Moscow, Maclean feared that he would never hear
from him again. Then, in 1956, five years after his disappearance and
following Khrushchev's famous denounciation of Stalin at the 20th Party
Congress, he received a telegram. "It was brief. He said that he was
well, and hoped that the family was well, too. He asked for the address
of my mother, who had never lost faith in him. He expressed no regret,
and had faith that the Soviet Union would get better."
Harold Macmillan, under whom Alan worked briefly at the publishers
Macmillan, famously described the patrician Donald as a "class traitor".
Discussing the Cambridge spies in the Commons, Macmillan
said: "Our Foreign Office regards this case as a personal wound, as when
something of the kind strikes at a family, or a ship, or a regiment."
Maclean loyally defends his brother. "If Macmillan was implying that
Donald had an obligation to his class rather than to what he thought to
be politically and humanely fair, then he was wrong. The word traitor
also implies that my brother felt, in some way, excluded or shut out,
that he wanted to take revenge. What motivated him was a sense of
injustice. He acted not for money or from hate, but from conviction. I
would have preferred it if he hadn't done what he did, but he was a
political animal."
One of the most vivid episodes in No, I Tell a Lie concerns Maclean's
journey to visit his brother in Moscow. It was January 1983 and proved
to be their only meeting for more than 30 years - Donald died a month
later. Frail, stooped and walking with a stick, Donald met his brother
at the aiport, pulling him gently into an embrace. He expressed surprise
at Alan's grey hair, as though it had violated the image he carried of
his brother in his head. "Donald looked not too bad, a bit grey in the airport lights. We held
hands rather shyly like children. It was going to be all right." They
talked "greedily" that night, but mostly about their childhoods. "Donald
said very little about what had happened to him."
No , I Tell a Lie is an unconventional memoir; Maclean delights in its
idiosyncrasy, in what is left out. There is nothing, for instance, about
his wife of 31 years, or their two sons, the younger of whom, Dan, died
at the age of ten; nothing about his inner life or his convictions.
Repeatedly, he says that he has "no political beliefs", as if he were
deliberately positioning himself against the hard ideology of his
brother. He is cannily interesting, though, on the treatment he received
for alcoholism in the early 1960s.
There is something inscrutable about Maclean that is hard to account
for. Intelligent, charming but shrewdly circumspect, he leaves much
unsaid. His voice drops as he talks about his family, but is animated
when discussing his public years in publishing. Ask him, for instance,
about his elder son, Ben, 29, and he becomes vague. "I'm not quite sure
what he does; I think he paints people's houses and does a bit of
research."
Of his wife, Robin, whom he met at Macmillan, he is equally cryptic. "She used to work as my secretary. We had a whirlwind seven-year romance
and then got married." When the photographer arrives, Alan
says: "Oh, look. Here comes the hangman."
He begins to chuckle. "Look, I feel it's much better to write and talk
about those who are dead. You can't hurt their feelings." If so, he
surely ought to have written about his late son in what is after all an
autobiography? But no. "I felt I had nothing interesting to say about
him," he says, sighing. "Anything I said would have been as cliched as a
1930s B movie."
You leave thinking that he would have made a perfect spy.
Not to be reproduced without permission.
|
|
|
|